Revenue Model
How the Rate Swap Protocol generates and distributes value.
Protocol Revenue Streams
1. Trading Fees
Mechanism: Fee charged on swap notional
- Fee rate: Configurable (e.g., 5-10 bps on notional)
- Charged on position open and close
- Paid by trader, accrued to pool or protocol
Example:
- $100,000 notional swap
- 10 bps (0.10%) fee
- Fee = $100 per trade
Revenue Potential:
- $1B monthly notional volume
- 10 bps average fee
- $1M monthly trading fee revenue
2. Spread Capture
Mechanism: Pool earns on bid-ask spread
- AMM quotes different rates for buy/sell
- Spread depends on market volatility and liquidity
- Additional profit for LPs beyond fees
Spread Sources:
- Rate impact from large trades
- Liquidity depth-based pricing
- Volatility-adjusted spreads
3. LP Pool Profits
Mechanism: Pool takes opposite side of user trades
- When users profit, pool loses (and vice versa)
- Diversified exposure across users reduces risk
- Pool aims for positive expectation from balanced flow
Risk Management:
- Reserve requirements limit exposure
- Liquidity depth controls max position
- DV01 budgeting for risk limits
4. Liquidation Penalties
Mechanism: Penalty charged when positions liquidated
- Liquidator receives portion of penalty
- Protocol/pool receives remainder
- Incentivizes healthy margin management
Example:
- $10,000 unhealthy position liquidated
- 5% liquidation penalty = $500
- Split: $250 to liquidator, $250 to pool
Value Distribution
Liquidity Providers (LPs)
Share of Value: Majority (70-90%)
Sources:
- Trading fees proportional to pool ownership
- Spread capture and market-making profits
- Liquidation penalty share
- Appreciation of pool NAV
Returns:
- Target: 10-30% APY on LP capital
- Varies with trading volume and market conditions
Protocol Treasury
Share of Value: Minority (10-30%)
Uses:
- Development and maintenance
- Audits and security
- Liquidity incentives
- Ecosystem grants
Mechanism:
- Protocol fee on trading fees (e.g., 20% of fees)
- Or direct fee on swaps routed to treasury
Token Holders (Future)
Share of Value: TBD (if governance token launched)
Potential Mechanisms:
- Fee sharing with token stakers
- Governance over protocol parameters
- Revenue buyback and burn
Fee Structure Examples
Conservative Model
- Trading Fee: 5 bps (0.05%)
- LP Share: 90%
- Protocol Share: 10%
Assumptions:
- $100M monthly volume
- Fee revenue: $50,000/month
- LP revenue: $45,000/month
- Protocol revenue: $5,000/month
Moderate Model
- Trading Fee: 10 bps (0.10%)
- LP Share: 80%
- Protocol Share: 20%
Assumptions:
- $500M monthly volume
- Fee revenue: $500,000/month
- LP revenue: $400,000/month
- Protocol revenue: $100,000/month
Aggressive Model
- Trading Fee: 15 bps (0.15%)
- LP Share: 70%
- Protocol Share: 30%
Assumptions:
- $1B monthly volume
- Fee revenue: $1,500,000/month
- LP revenue: $1,050,000/month
- Protocol revenue: $450,000/month
LP Economics
Depositing to Pool
- LP deposits collateral (e.g., $100,000 USDC)
- Receives pool shares based on NAV
- Shares represent claim on pool assets
Earning Returns
- Fees: Proportional to share ownership
- Market-Making: Pool profits from balanced flow
- Compounding: Fees increase NAV, boosting share value
Withdrawing from Pool
- LP burns shares
- Receives proportional NAV in collateral
- Realizes gains/losses from pool performance
LP Risks
- Directional Risk: Pool takes opposite side of trades
- Liquidation Risk: Undercollateralized positions drain pool
- Oracle Risk: Stale or manipulated oracle impacts settlement
- Smart Contract Risk: Bugs or exploits
Mitigation:
- Reserve requirements
- Health monitoring and liquidations
- Robust oracle framework
- Audits and testing
Protocol Sustainability
Self-Sustaining Model
- Fees cover operational costs
- Treasury builds reserves for development
- No reliance on token inflation
Growth Investment
- Early stage: Lower fees to attract volume
- Mature stage: Optimize fees for sustainability
- Use treasury for ecosystem growth
Long-Term Vision
- Become core DeFi primitive
- Integration across Solana ecosystem
- Self-sustaining through organic fee revenue
Fee Optimization
Balancing Act
- Too High: Reduces volume, drives users away
- Too Low: Insufficient revenue, unsustainable
- Optimal: Maximizes volume × fee rate
Dynamic Fee Potential
Future enhancement: Adjust fees based on:
- Market volatility (higher vol = higher fees)
- Liquidity depth (lower liquidity = higher fees)
- Competitive landscape
Market Research
Monitor competitor fees:
- Perp DEXs: 2-10 bps
- Spot DEXs: 5-30 bps
- Rate swap protocols: 10-20 bps
Next Steps
- Business Overview - Strategic context
- Risk Framework - How we manage protocol risk
- Engineering Architecture - Technical implementation